Judgey Mcjudgey Bot

Anyone else think AI is judging them?

I use Claude *a lot* for work. Never as a source of fact, but often to help validate a direction I'm pushing towards, highlight gaps, spot similarities, dig up case studies, simplify language. Sometimes I'll ask it to rewrite creative lines, and then feel gratified that my copywriting is still better than the bots. All pretty standard use cases.

But. I'm wondering if this one thing might be weird -

I have a 'life LLM' and a 'work LLM.' Claude gets the brand strategist version of me. ChatGPT gets the 'mum' version; the toddler health queries, the home maintenance questions, the 'plan out my itinerary for a 2hr layover in Singapore Changi Airport with 2x kids' requests.

And there is LITERALLY NO WAY I'd use Chat for a work question, or Claude for a life question. Maybe it's about leveraging what I perceive to be each tool's benefits? Maybe it's to create a walled garden where each tool can optimise its answers, based on the specific inputs I'm giving it?

But - maybe it's because I don't want my 'workmate' Claude to judge me. Because I don't want it to see some of more inane questions, asking things I feel other competent adults would know, or maybe even because I don't want it to see me as a Mum?!

Is this - crazy? Common? Anyone else creating and then questioning the rules they've put on their relationships with AI?